当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Environ. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Conspiracy theories and climate change: A systematic review
Journal of Environmental Psychology ( IF 7.649 ) Pub Date : 2023-09-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102129
Kim-Pong Tam , Hoi-Wing Chan

Research on conspiracy theories and climate change is emerging. Existing studies came from a range of scholarly disciplines, asked different research questions, and used various research methods. Given the heterogeneity in these studies, there is a pressing need to synthesize the current state of knowledge on the topic and identify the priority directions for further research. We address this need with a preregistered systematic review. Our review covered 43 studies from 38 articles. We organized our review of these studies by the following methodological categories: survey studies, experiments, interview studies, media studies, ethnographic studies, and mathematically modelling. For each category, we offered a summary of evidence, highlighted the key insights, and identify knowledge gaps. We concluded with a proposed integrative framework for research on the topic. As conspiracy theories can be an obstacle to climate change mitigation and adaptation, the present review would provide invaluable insights for not only scientists but also climate-related practitioners (e.g., environmental organizations, educators) and decision makers (e.g., policymakers) to consider.



中文翻译:

阴谋论与气候变化:系统回顾

关于阴谋论和气候变化的研究正在兴起。现有的研究来自一系列学术学科,提出不同的研究问题,并使用不同的研究方法。鉴于这些研究的异质性,迫切需要综合该主题的当前知识状态并确定进一步研究的优先方向。我们通过预先注册的系统审查来满足这一需求。我们的综述涵盖了 38 篇文章中的 43 项研究。我们通过以下方法类别对这些研究进行回顾:调查研究、实验、访谈研究、媒体研究、民族志研究和数学建模。对于每个类别,我们提供了证据摘要,强调了关键见解,并确定了知识差距。我们最后提出了该主题研究的拟议综合框架。由于阴谋论可能成为减缓和适应气候变化的障碍,本次审查不仅为科学家提供了宝贵的见解,也为气候相关从业者(例如环境组织、教育工作者)和决策者(例如政策制定者)​​提供了宝贵的见解。

更新日期:2023-09-01
down
wechat
bug