Environmental footprints and implications of converting GHG species to value-added chemicals: a review

References

Abanades, J.C., Rubin, E.S., Mazzotti, M., and Herzog, H.J. (2017). On the climate change mitigation potential of CO2 conversion to fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 10: 2491–2499, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02819a.Search in Google Scholar

Abdelkareem, M.A., Elsaid, K., Wilberforce, T., Kamil, M., Sayed, E.T., and Olabi, A. (2021). Environmental aspects of fuel cells: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 752: 141803, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141803.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

ADB (Asian Development Bank) (2014). Turning deadly methane gas into clean energy, Available at: www.adb.org/results/turning-deadly-methane-gas-clean-energy (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Adnan, M.A. and Kibria, M.G. (2020). Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of power-to-methanol synthesis pathways. Appl. Energy 278: 115614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115614.Search in Google Scholar

Adhikari, B., Orme, C.J., Klaehn, J.R., and Stewart, F.F. (2021). Techno-economic analysis of oxygen-nitrogen separation for oxygen enrichment using membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 268: 118703, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118703.Search in Google Scholar

Ahn, Y., Byun, J., Kim, D., Kim, B.S., Lee, C.S., and Han, J. (2019). System-level analysis and life cycle assessment of CO2 and fossil-based formic acid strategies. Green Chem. 21: 3442–3455, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9gc01280j.Search in Google Scholar

Ajayi, T., Gomes, J.S., and Bera, A. (2019). A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Pet. Sci. 16: 1028–1063, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8.Search in Google Scholar

Aldaco, R., Butnar, I., Margallo, M., Laso, J., Rumayor, M., Dominguez-Ramos, A., Irabien, A., and Dodds, P.E. (2019). Bringing value to the chemical industry from capture, storage and use of CO2: a dynamic lca of formic acid production. Sci. Total Environ. 663: 738–753, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.395.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Al-Ghussain, L. (2019). Global warming: review on driving forces and mitigation. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 38: 13–21, https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13041.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Shafei, E.N., Albahar, M.Z., Aljishi, M.F., and Al-Badairy, H.H. (2021). Effect of the zirconia-titania catalyst modification and CO2/CH4 ratios on CO2 coupling reaction with methane. Mol. Catal. 515: 111942, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111942.Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez, M., Marín, P., and Ordóñez, S. (2022). Upgrading of methane emissions via chemical looping over copper-zeolites: experiments and modelling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 259: 117818, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117818.Search in Google Scholar

Aromada, S.A. and Kvamme, B. (2019). Impacts of CO2 and H2S on the risk of hydrate formation during pipeline transport of natural gas. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 13: 616–627, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1795-2.Search in Google Scholar

Artz, J., Müller, T.E., Thenert, K., Kleinekorte, J., Meys, R., Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., and Leitner, W. (2018). Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: an integrated review of catalysis and life cycle assessment. Chem. Rev. 118: 434–504, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Asahi Kasei (2021). Asahi kasei licenses technology package to manufacture high-purity ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate using CO2 as main feedstock, Available at: www.asahi-kasei.com/news/2021/e210701.html (Accessed 30 July 2022).10.1016/S0958-2118(21)00148-8Search in Google Scholar

Ayodele, F.O., Mustapa, S.I., Ayodele, B.V., and Mohammad, N. (2020). An overview of economic analysis and environmental impacts of natural gas conversion technologies. Sustainability 12: 10148, https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310148.Search in Google Scholar

Baena-Moreno, F.M., Rodríguez-Galán, M., Vega, F., Alonso-Fariñas, B., Vilches Arenas, L.F., and Navarrete, B. (2019). Carbon capture and utilization technologies: a literature review and recent advances. Energy sources part a recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 41: 1403–1433, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1548518.Search in Google Scholar

Barbera, A.C., Vymazal, J., and Maucieri, C. (2019). Greenhouse gases formation and emission. In: Fath, B. (Ed.). Enclopedia of ecology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 329–333.10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10895-4Search in Google Scholar

Batamack, P.T., Mathew, T., and Prakash, G.S. (2017). One-pot conversion of methane to light olefins or higher hydrocarbons through H-SAPO-34-catalyzed in situ halogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139: 18078–18083, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b10725.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bellotti, D., Rivarolo, M., and Magistri, L. (2019). Economic feasibility of methanol synthesis as a method for CO2 reduction and energy storage. Energy Proc. 158: 4721–4728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.730.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, S.J., Schroeder, D.J., and McCoy, S.T. (2014). Towards a framework for discussing and assessing CO2 utilisation in a climate context. Energy Proc. 63: 7976–7992, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.835.Search in Google Scholar

Biernacki, P., Röther, T., Paul, W., Werner, P., and Steinigeweg, S. (2018). Environmental impact of the excess electricity conversion into methanol. J. Clean. Prod. 191: 87–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.232.Search in Google Scholar

Centi, G., Quadrelli, E.A., and Perathoner, S. (2013). Catalysis for CO2 conversion: a key technology for rapid introduction of renewable energy in the value chain of chemical industries. Energy Environ. Sci. 6: 1711–1731, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee00056g.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, C., Hu, W., Sun, J., Li, W., and Song, Y. (2019). CH4 adsorption and diffusion in shale pores from molecular simulation and a model for CH4 adsorption in shale matrix. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 141: 367–378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.06.087.Search in Google Scholar

CRI (Carbon Recycling International) (2022). Projects: emissions-to-liquids technology, Available at: www.carbonrecycling.is/projects (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Crivellari, A., Moreno, V.C., Cozzani, V., and Dincer, I. (2021). Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of potential methanol production processes. J. Clean. Prod. 293: 126226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126226.Search in Google Scholar

Dalena, F., Senatore, A., Basile, M., Knani, S., Basile, A., and Iulianelli, A. (2018a). Advances in methanol production and utilization, with particular emphasis toward hydrogen generation via membrane reactor technology. Membranes 8: 98, https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8040098.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Dalena, F., Senatore, A., Marino, A., Gordano, A., Basile, M., and Basile, A. (2018b). Methanol production and applications: an overview. Methanol 2018: 3–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63903-5.00001-7.Search in Google Scholar

Da Silva, M.J. (2016). Synthesis of methanol from methane: challenges and advances on the multi-step (syngas) and one-step routes (DMTM). Fuel Process. Technol. 145: 42–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.01.023.Search in Google Scholar

De Benedetto, L. and Klemeš, J. (2009). The environmental performance strategy map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process. J. Clean. Prod. 17: 900–906, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.012.Search in Google Scholar

Delledonne, D., Rivetti, F., and Romano, U. (2001). Developments in the production and application of dimethylcarbonate. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 221: 241–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(01)00796-7.Search in Google Scholar

Emerson, D.F. and Stephanopoulos, G. (2019). Limitations in converting waste gases to fuels and chemicals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 59: 39–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.02.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2021a). Climate change indicators: greenhouse gases, Available at: www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/greenhouse-gases (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2021b). Overview of greenhouse gases, Available at: www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#methane (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Fallah Ramezani, S., Karimi, M., Panahi, M., and Rafiee, A. (2020). Sustainable dimethyl carbonate production from ethylene oxide and methanol. Chem. Eng. Technol. 43: 2484–2492, https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000150.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, N., Lin, H., Song, H., Yang, L., Tang, D., Deng, F., and Ye, J. (2021). Efficient and selective photocatalytic CH4 conversion to CH3OH with O2 by controlling overoxidation on TiO2. Nat. Commun. 12: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24912-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Gaikwad, N., Sangwai, J., Linga, P., and Kumar, R. (2021). Separation of coal mine methane gas mixture via sII and sH hydrate formation. Fuel 305: 121467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121467.Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Herrero, I., Cuéllar-Franca, R.M., Enriquez-Gutierrez, V.M., Alvarez-Guerra, M., Irabien, A., and Azapagic, A. (2016). Environmental assessment of dimethyl carbonate production: comparison of a novel electrosynthesis route utilizing CO2 with a commercial oxidative carbonylation process. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4: 2088–2097, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01515.Search in Google Scholar

Ghiat, I. and Al-Ansari, T. (2021). A review of carbon capture and utilisation as a CO2 abatement opportunity within the EWF nexus. J. CO2 Util. 45: 101432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101432.Search in Google Scholar

GMI (Global Methane Initiative) (2021). Global methane emissions and mitigation opportunities, Available at: www.globalmethane.org/documents/gmi-mitigation-factsheet.pdf (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Häussinger, P., Lohmüller, R., and Watson, A.M. (2000). Hydrogen. In: Elvers, B. (Ed.). Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Hoboken.10.1002/14356007.a13_297Search in Google Scholar

Hermesmann, M. and Müller, T.E. (2022). Green, turquoise, blue, or grey? environmentally friendly hydrogen production in transforming energy systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 90: 100996, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2022.100996.Search in Google Scholar

Hetland, J., Barnett, J., Read, A., Zapatero, J., and Veltin, J. (2014). CO2 Transport systems development: status of three large european CCS demonstration projects with EEPR funding. Energy Procedia 63: 2458–2466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.268.Search in Google Scholar

Hietala, J., Vuori, A., Johnsson, P., Pollari, I., Reutemann, W., and Kieczka, H. (2016). Formic acid. In: Elvers, B. (Ed.). Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Hoboken.10.1002/14356007.a12_013.pub3Search in Google Scholar

Ho, H.J., Iizuka, A., and Shibata, E. (2019). Carbon capture and utilization technology without carbon dioxide purification and pressurization: a review on its necessity and available technologies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58: 8941–8954, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01213.Search in Google Scholar

Ho, M.T., Allinson, G.W., and Wiley, D.E. (2008). Reducing the cost of CO2 capture from flue gases using membrane technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47: 1562–1568, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070541y.Search in Google Scholar

Hoppe, W., Thonemann, N., and Bringezu, S. (2018). Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide-based production of methane and methanol and derived polymers. J. Ind. Ecol. 22: 327–340, https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12583.Search in Google Scholar

House, K.Z., Baclig, A.C., Ranjan, M., van Nierop, E.A., Wilcox, J., and Herzog, H.J. (2011). Economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108: 20428–20433, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012253108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Huang, H., Samsun, R.C., Peters, R., and Stolten, D. (2021). Greener production of dimethyl carbonate by the power-to-fuel concept: a comparative techno-economic analysis. Green Chem. 23: 1734–1747, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc03865b.Search in Google Scholar

Idem, R., Supap, T., Shi, H., Gelowitz, D., Ball, M., Campbell, C., and Tontiwachwuthikul, P. (2015). Practical experience in post-combustion CO2 capture using reactive solvents in large pilot and demonstration plants. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40: 6–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2020). Methane tracker 2021. methane and climate change, Available at: www.iea.org/reports/methane-tracker-2020 (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2021a). Chemicals, Available at: www.iea.org/reports/chemicals (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2021b). Direct air capture, Available at: www.iea.org/reports/direct-air-capture (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2021c). Is carbon capture too expensive? Available at: www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency) (2021). Innovation outlook: renewable methanol, Available at: www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2021/Jan/IRENA_Innovation_Renewable_Methanol_2021.pdf (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, R.B., Solomon, E.I., Canadell, J.G., Cargnello, M., and Field, C.B. (2019). Methane removal and atmospheric restoration. Nat. Sustain. 2: 436–438, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0299-x.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, R.B., Abernethy, S., Canadell, J.G., Cargnello, M., Davis, S.J., Féron, S., Fuss, S., Heyer, A.J., Hong, C., Jones, C.D., et al.. (2021). Atmospheric methane removal: a research agenda. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 379: 20200454, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0454.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jangam, A., Das, S., Dewangan, N., Hongmanorom, P., Hui, W.M., and Kawi, S. (2020). Conversion of CO2 to C1 chemicals: catalyst design, kinetics and mechanism aspects of the reactions. Catal. Today 358: 3–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.08.049.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, C. and Duyar, M.S. (2021). Thermodynamic analysis of dry reforming of methane for yalorization of landfill gas and natural gas. Energy Technol 9: 2100106, https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202100106.Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, D.R. and Adhikari, N. (2019). An overview on common organic solvents and their toxicity. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 28: 1–18, https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2019/v28i330203.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, D., Byun, J., and Han, J. (2021). Evaluating the environmental impacts of formic acid production from CO2: catalytic hydrogenation vs. electrocatalytic reduction. Green Chem. 23: 9470–9478, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02997e.Search in Google Scholar

Kearns, D.A., Liu, H.A., and Consoli, C.H. (2021). Technology readiness and costs of CCS, Available at: scienceforsustainability.org/w/images/b/bc/Technology-Readiness-and-Costs-for-CCS-2021-1.pdf (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Kim, D. and Han, J. (2020). Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide. Appl. Energy 264: 114711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114711.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, H., Byun, M., Lee, B., and Lim, H. (2022). Carbon-neutral methanol synthesis as carbon dioxide utilization at different scales: economic and environmental perspectives. Energy Convers. Manag. 252: 115119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115119.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J., Maiti, A., Lin, L.C., Stolaroff, J.K., Smit, B., and Aines, R.D. (2013). New materials for methane capture from dilute and medium concentration sources. Nat. Commun. 4: 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2697.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kirschner, M.J., Alekseev, A., Dowy, S., Grahl, M., Jansson, L., Keil, P., Lauermann, G., Meilinger, M., Schmehl, W., Weckler, H., et al.. (2017). Oxygen. In: Elvers, B. (Ed.). Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Hoboken.10.1002/14356007.a18_329.pub2Search in Google Scholar

Klemeš, J.J. (Ed.) (2015). Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.10.1007/s10098-015-0930-0Search in Google Scholar

Knapik, E., Kosowski, P., and Stopa, J. (2018). Cryogenic liquefaction and separation of CO2 using nitrogen removal unit cold energy. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 131: 66–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.12.027.Search in Google Scholar

Kongpanna, P., Pavarajarn, V., Gani, R., and Assabumrungrat, S. (2015). Techno-economic evaluation of different CO2-based processes for dimethyl carbonate production. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 93: 496–510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.07.013.Search in Google Scholar

Kula, K., Kącka-Zych, A., Łapczuk-Krygier, A., and Jasiński, R. (2021). Analysis of the possibility and molecular mechanism of carbon dioxide consumption in the diels-alder processes. Pure Appl. Chem. 93: 427–446, https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2020-1009.Search in Google Scholar

Küngas, R. (2020). Electrochemical CO2 reduction for CO production: comparison of low-and high-temperature electrolysis technologies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167: 044508, https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7099.Search in Google Scholar

Lackner, K.S. (2020). Practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal. Nat. Sustain. 3: 357, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0496-7.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, J.P. (2021). Towards circular carbo-chemicals – the metamorphosis of petrochemicals. Energy Environ. Sci. 14: 4358–4376, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee00532d.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Q., Ouyang, Y., Li, H., Wang, L., and Zeng, J. (2022). Photocatalytic conversion of methane: recent advancements and prospects. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 61: 202108069, https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202108069.Search in Google Scholar

Lozano, E.M., Petersen, S.B., Paulsen, M.M., Rosendahl, L.A., and Pedersen, T.H. (2021). Techno-economic evaluation of carbon capture via physical absorption from HTL gas phase derived from woody biomass and sewage sludge. Energy Convers. Manag. X 11: 100089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100089.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, B., Shen, Y., Tang, Z., Zhang, D., and Chen, G. (2021). Vacuum pressure swing adsorption process for coalbed methane enrichment. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 32: 264–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.08.043.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, H., Ma, X., Huang, K., Fu, L., and Azimi, M. (2020). Carbon dioxide transport via pipelines: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 266: 121994, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121994.Search in Google Scholar

Madejski, P., Chmiel, K., Subramanian, N., and Kuś, T. (2022). Methods and techniques for CO2 capture: review of potential solutions and applications in modern energy technologies. Energies 15: 887, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030887.Search in Google Scholar

Markets and Markets (2021a). Dimethyl carbonate market, Available at: www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/dimethyl-carbonate-market-24544228.html?gclid=Cj0KCQiA95aRBhCsARIsAC2xvfx-6rwI3InXmGQMwzP7WUgSkYO-N1TpHZHDw50yYKj-X6aLT0J39d4aAlnyEALw_wcB (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Markets and Markets (2021b). Ethylene carbonate market, Available at: www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ethylene-carbonate-market-229766138.html?gclid=Cj0KCQiA95aRBhCsARIsAC2xvfw9kzqRhx_v5ncIPefWMu6ybLw2L48oSbsVwQtr5ketIsQBTO3NjK0aAhOEEALw_wcB (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Markewitz, P., Marx, J., Schreiber, A., and Zapp, P. (2013). Ecological evaluation of coal-fired oxyfuel power plants-cryogenic versus membrane-based air separation. Energy Proc. 37: 2864–2876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.172.Search in Google Scholar

Medrano-Garcia, J.D., Javaloyes-Anton, J., Vazquez, D., Ruiz-Femenia, R., and Caballero, J.A. (2021). Alternative carbon dioxide utilization in dimethyl carbonate synthesis and comparison with current technologies. J. CO2 Util. 45: 101436, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101436.Search in Google Scholar

Mehmeti, A., Angelis-Dimakis, A., Arampatzis, G., McPhail, S.J., and Ulgiati, S. (2018). Life cycle assessment and water footprint of hydrogen production methods: from conventional to emerging technologies. Environments 5: 24, https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5020024.Search in Google Scholar

Meng, X., Cui, X., Rajan, N.P., Yu, L., Deng, D., and Bao, X. (2019). Direct methane conversion under mild condition by thermo-, electro-, or photocatalysis. Chem 5: 2296–2325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.008.Search in Google Scholar

Mercure, J.F., Salas, P., Vercoulen, P., Semieniuk, G., Lam, A., Pollitt, H., Holden, P.B., Vakilifard, N., Chewpreecha, U., Edwards, N.R., et al.. (2021). Reframing incentives for climate policy action. Nat. Energy 6: 1133–1143, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00934-2.Search in Google Scholar

Mitsui & Co., Ltd (2015). Methanol manufacturing business in texas commences production, Available at: www.mitsui.com/jp/en/release/2015/1213807_6474.html (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Mitsui & Co., Ltd (2021). U.S. JV to increase production of methanol derived from CO2, Available at: www.mitsui.com/jp/en/topics/2021/1240906_12171.html (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Montzka, S.A., Dlugokencky, E.J., and Butler, J.H. (2011). Review: non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature 476: 43–50, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10322.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mordor Intelligence (2022). Formic acid market – growth, trends, COVID-19 impact, and forecasts (2022–2027), Available at: www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/formic-acid-market (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Morimoto, S., Thuy, N., Kitagawa, N., and Kataoka, S. (2021). Scenario assessment for producing methanol through carbon capture and utilization technologies considering regional characteristics. J. CO2 Util. 45: 101452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101452.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, L.J., Kätelhön, A., Bachmann, M., Zimmermann, A., Sternberg, A., and Bardow, A. (2020a). A guideline for life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization. Front. Energy Res. 8: 15, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00015.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, L.J., Kätelhön, A., Bringezu, S., McCoy, S., Suh, S., Edwards, R., Sick, V., Kaiser, S., Cuéllar-Franca, R., El Khamlichi, A., et al.. (2020b). The carbon footprint of the carbon feedstock CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 13: 2979–2992, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01530j.Search in Google Scholar

Ohno, H., Ikhlayel, M., Tamura, M., Nakao, K., Suzuki, K., Morita, K., Kato, Y., Tomishige, K., and Fukushima, Y. (2021). Direct dimethyl carbonate synthesis from CO2 and methanol catalyzed by CeO2 and assisted by 2-cyanopyridine: a cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emission study. Green Chem. 23: 457–469, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc03349a.Search in Google Scholar

Olajossy, A., Gawdzik, A., Budner, Z., and Dula, J. (2003). Methane separation from coal mine methane gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 81: 474–482, https://doi.org/10.1205/026387603765173736.Search in Google Scholar

Osat, M. and Shojaati, F. (2022). Techno-economic-environmental evaluation of a combined tri and dry reforming of methane for methanol synthesis with a high efficiency CO2 utilization. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47: 9058–9070, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.207.Search in Google Scholar

Osman, A.I., Hefny, M., Abdel Maksoud, M.I.A., Elgarahy, A.M., and Rooney, D.W. (2021). Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19: 797–849, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3.Search in Google Scholar

Otsuka, K. and Wang, Y. (2001). Direct conversion of methane into oxygenates. App. Catal. A-Gen. 222: 145–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(01)00837-7.Search in Google Scholar

Ott, J., Gronemann, V., Pontzen, F., Fiedler, E., Grossmann, G., Kersebohm, D.B., Weiss, G., and Witte, C. (2012). Methanol. In: Elvers, B. (Ed.). Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Hoboken.10.1002/14356007.a16_465.pub3Search in Google Scholar

Park, M.B., Park, E.D., and Ahn, W.S. (2019). Recent progress in direct conversion of methane to methanol over copper-exchanged zeolites. Front. Chem. 7: 514, https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00514.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Parkinson, B., Balcombe, P., Speirs, J.F., Hawkes, A.D., and Hellgardt, K. (2019). Levelized cost of CO2 mitigation from hydrogen production routes. Energy Environ. Sci. 12: 19–40, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee02079e.Search in Google Scholar

Peach, J. and Eastoe, J. (2014). Supercritical carbon dioxide: a solvent like no other. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 10: 1878–1895, https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.10.196.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Peletiri, S.P., Rahmanian, N., and Mujtaba, I.M. (2018). CO2 pipeline design: a review. Energies 11: 2184, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092184.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Fortes, M., Schöneberger, J.C., Boulamanti, A., Harrison, G., and Tzimas, E. (2016a). Formic acid synthesis using CO2 as raw material: techno-economic and environmental evaluation and market potential. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41: 16444–16462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.199.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Fortes, M., Schöneberger, J.C., Boulamanti, A., and Tzimas, E. (2016b). Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: techno-economic and environmental assessment. Appl. Energy 161: 718–732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.067.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Fortes, M. and Tzimas, E. (2016). Techno-economic and environmental evaluation of CO2 utilisation for fuel production. synthesis of methanol and formic acid, Available at: publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC99380 (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Psarras, P., He, J., Pilorgé, H., McQueen, N., Jensen-Fellows, A., Kian, K., and Wilcox, J. (2020). Cost analysis of carbon capture and sequestration from US natural gas-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54: 6272–6280, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06147.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Putro, W.S., Ikeda, A., Shigeyasu, S., Hamura, S., Matsumoto, S., Lee, V.Y., Choi, J.C., and Fukaya, N. (2021). Sustainable catalytic synthesis of diethyl carbonate. ChemSusChem 14: 842–846, https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002471.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ravi, M., Ranocchiari, M., and van Bokhoven, J.A. (2017). The direct catalytic oxidation of methane to methanol – a critical assessment. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 56: 16464–16483, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201702550.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ren, J., Lee, H.M., Thai, T.D., and Na, D. (2020). Identification of a cytosine methyltransferase that improves transformation efficiency in methylomonas sp. DH-1. Biotechnolog. Biofuels 13: 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-020-9334-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rubin, E.S., Davison, J.E., and Herzog, H.J. (2015). The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40: 378–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018.Search in Google Scholar

Rumayor, M., Dominguez-Ramos, A., and Irabien, A. (2018). Formic acid manufacture: carbon dioxide utilization alternatives. Appl. Sci. 8: 914–918, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060914.Search in Google Scholar

Rumayor, M., Dominguez-Ramos, A., and Irabien, A. (2019a). Environmental and economic assessment of the formic acid electrochemical manufacture using carbon dioxide: influence of the electrode lifetime. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 18: 72–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Rumayor, M., Dominguez-Ramos, A., and Irabien, A. (2019b). Innovative alternatives to methanol manufacture: carbon footprint assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 225: 426–434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.015.Search in Google Scholar

Saavalainen, P., Kabra, S., Turpeinen, E., Oravisjärvi, K., Yadav, G.D., Keiski, R.L., and Pongrácz, E. (2015). Sustainability assessment of chemical processes: evaluation of three synthesis routes of DMC. J. Chem. 2015: 402315, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/402315.Search in Google Scholar

Sahoo, K.K., Goswami, G., and Das, D. (2021). Biotransformation of methane and carbon dioxide into high-value products by methanotrophs: current state of art and future prospects. Front. Microbiol. 12: 636486, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.636486.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Sanz-Perez, E.S., Murdock, C.R., Didas, S.A., and Jones, C.W. (2016). Direct capture of CO2 from ambient air. Chem. Rev. 116: 11840–11876, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Schwach, P., Pan, X., and Bao, X. (2017). Direct conversion of methane to value-added chemicals over heterogeneous catalysts: challenges and prospects. Chem. Rev. 117: 8497–8520, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00715.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shaton, K., Hervik, A., and Hjelle, H.M. (2020). The environmental footprint of natural gas transportation: LNG vs. pipeline. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 9: 223–242, https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.8.2.ksha.Search in Google Scholar

Shindell, D., Borgford-Parnell, N., Brauer, M., Haines, A., Kuylenstierna, J.C.I., Leonard, S.A., Ramanathan, V., Ravishankara, A., Amann, M., and Srivastava, L. (2017). A climate policy pathway for near-and long-term benefits. Science 356: 493–494, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aak9521.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sifat, N.S. and Haseli, Y. (2019). A critical review of CO2 capture technologies and prospects for clean power generation. Energies 12: 4143, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214143.Search in Google Scholar

Sirajuddin, S. and Rosenzweig, A.C. (2015). Enzymatic oxidation of methane. Biochemistry 54: 2283–2294, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00198.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ski Co (Aspen Snowmass Company) (2021). Capturing coal methane to power operations, Available at: www.aspensnowmass.com/discover/sustainability/our-stories (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Smith, E., Morris, J., Kheshgi, H., Teletzke, G., Herzog, H., and Paltsev, S. (2021). The cost of CO2 transport and storage in global integrated assessment modeling. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 109: 103367, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103367.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, B.E., Bols, M.L., Rhoda, H.M., Plessers, D., Schoonheydt, R.A., Sels, B.F., and Solomon, E.I. (2021). Cage effects control the mechanism of methane hydroxylation in zeolites. Science 373: 327–331, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd5803.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Srivastava, R.K., Sarangi, P.K., Bhatia, L., Singh, A.K., and Shadangi, K.P. (2022). Conversion of methane to methanol: technologies and future challenges. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 12: 1851–1875, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01872-5.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, A., Jens, C.M., and Bardow, A. (2017). Life cycle assessment of CO2-based C1-Chemicals. Green Chem. 19: 2244–2259, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc02852g.Search in Google Scholar

Strube, R., Pellegrini, G., and Manfrida, G. (2011). The environmental impact of post-combustion CO2 capture with MEA, with aqueous ammonia, and with an aqueous ammonia-ethanol mixture for a coal-fired power plant. Energy 36: 3763–3770, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.060.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, H.Z., Wang, Z.Q., Xu, Z.N., Sun, J., Xu, Y.P., Chen, Q.S., Chen, Y., and Guo, G.C. (2018). Review on the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate. Catal. Today 316: 2–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.021.Search in Google Scholar

Thonemann, N. (2020). Environmental impacts of CO2-based chemical production: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Appl. Energy 263: 114599, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114599.Search in Google Scholar

Thonemann, N. and Pizzol, M. (2019). Consequential life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization technologies within the chemical industry. Energy Environ. Sci. 12: 2253–2263, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee00914k.Search in Google Scholar

Tian, J., Tan, J., Zhang, Z., Han, P., Yin, M., Wan, S., Lin, J., Wang, S., and Wang, Y. (2020). Direct conversion of methane to formaldehyde and CO on B2O3 catalysts. Nat. Commun. 11: 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19517-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Van der Zwaan, B.C.C., Schoots, K., Rivera-Tinoco, R., and Verbong, G.P.J. (2011). The cost of pipelining climate change mitigation: an overview of the economics of CH4, CO2 and H2 transportation. Appl. Energy 88: 3821–3831, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.019.Search in Google Scholar

Vega, F., Cano, M., Camino, S., Fernández, L.M.G., Portillo, E., and Navarrete, B. (2018). Solvents for carbon dioxide capture. In: Karamé, I., Shaya, J., and Srour, H. (Eds.), Carbon dioxide chemistry, capture and oil recovery. IntechOpen, London, pp. 142–163.10.5772/intechopen.71443Search in Google Scholar

Wang, H., Chen, J., and Li, Q. (2019). A review of pipeline transportation technology of carbon dioxide. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 310: 032033, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/310/3/032033.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Otto, A., Robinius, M., and Stolten, D. (2017). A review of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies from coal-fired power plants. Energy Proc. 114: 650–665, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1209.Search in Google Scholar

WEF (World Economic Forum) (2021). Methane is a more potent polluter than CO2 – here’s how energy firms can help contain it, Available at: www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/how-can-energy-firms-can-stop-methane-leaks/ (Accessed 30 July 2022).Search in Google Scholar

White, C.M., Smith, D.H., Jones, K.L., Goodman, A.L., Jikich, S.A., LaCount, R.B., DuBose, S.B., Ozdemir, E., Morsi, B.I., and Schroeder, K.T. (2005). Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery: a review. Energy Fuels 19: 659–724, https://doi.org/10.1021/ef040047w.Search in Google Scholar

Wilberforce, T., Olabi, A.G., Sayed, E.T., Elsaid, K., and Abdelkareem, M.A. (2021). Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 761: 143203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143203.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wu, J. and Zhou, X.D. (2016). Catalytic Conversion of co2 to value added fuels: current status, challenges and future directions. Chinese J. Catal. 37: 999–1015, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(16)62455-5.Search in Google Scholar

Wunderlich, J., Armstrong, K., Buchner, G.A., Styring, P., and Schomäcker, R. (2021). Integration of techno-economic and life cycle assessment: defining and applying integration types for chemical technology development. J. Clean. Prod. 287: 125021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125021.Search in Google Scholar

Yaashikaa, P.R., Kumar, P.S., Varjani, S.J., and Saravanan, A. (2019). A review on photochemical, biochemical and electrochemical transformation of CO2 into value-added products. J. CO2 Util. 33: 131–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.017.Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Y., Matsuzaki, T., Tanaka, S., Nishihira, K., Ohdan, K., Nakamura, A., and Okamoto, Y. (1997). Catalysis and characterization of Pd/NaY for dimethyl carbonate synthesis from methyl nitrite and CO. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 93: 3721–3727, https://doi.org/10.1039/a702015e.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Liu, J., Shen, W., Li, J., and Chien, I.L. (2018). High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming. Energy 158: 820–829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.061.Search in Google Scholar

Yusuf, R.O., Adeniran, J.A., Mustapha, S.I., and Sonibare, J.A. (2019). Energy recovery from municipal solid waste in Nigeria and its economic and environmental implications. Environ. Qual. Manag. 28: 33–43, https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21617.Search in Google Scholar

Zain, M.M. and Mohamed, A.R. (2018). An overview on conversion technologies to produce value added products from CH4 and CO2 as major biogas constituents. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 98: 56–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Zeng, G., Wang, Y., Gong, D., Zhang, Y., Wu, P., and Sun, Y. (2019). Dual-role membrane as NH3 permselective reactor and azeotrope separator in urea alcoholysis. ACS Cent. Sci. 5: 1834–1843, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00812.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zhai, H. and Rubin, E.S. (2018). Systems analysis of physical absorption of CO2 in ionic liquids for pre-combustion carbon capture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52: 4996–5004, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00411.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zimmermann, A.W. and Schomäcker, R. (2017). What horse to bet on in CO2 utilization? – an assessment case study for dimethyl carbonate production. Tech. Connect. Briefs. 2017: 277–280.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A.W., Wunderlich, J., Müller, L., Buchner, G.A., Marxen, A., Michailos, S., Armstrong, K., Naims, H., McCord, S., Styring, P., et al. (2020). Techno-economic assessment guidelines for CO2 utilization. Front. Energy Res. 8: 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005.Search in Google Scholar